"get the pre-2.1 development build into a useful state again" ooooh! Does that mean like near the end of beta (2.0 Release Candidate)? -- Don Ireland
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:45:06 -0500, Derek Konigsberg wrote: > It is true that this feature was accidentally forgotten from 2.x, as it > was added late to 1.1. The funny part is that most of the code for it > actually is still in the application. It just isn't hooked up all the > way through the UI. However, I'm currently treating v2.0 as > string-frozen for internationalization purposes, and this feature does > require menu items with text, so it may get pushed to 2.1. > > That being said, the 2.0 beta is (hopefully) stable enough at this point > that I may start merging my fixes back into trunk and get the pre-2.1 > development build into a useful state again. Once I do, this may be one > of the first features I implement. (Of course if I do have most of the > internationalization strings for this feature in the 1.1 code, I may be > able to just sneak it into 2.0 anyways. We'll see.) > > -Derek > > On 03/09/2011 04:34 PM, Don Ireland wrote: > > It is my understanding that the code for 2.x was almost completely > > rewritten from the ground up. Although I'm sure some of the basic protocol > > stuff was ported over. > > > > With that being the case, it's pretty easy and understandable to drop a > > feature that was there. However, I have seen a ticket in which this was > > requested. > > > > Don't forget that Derek is basically donating his time& efforts to this > > project and we all benefit from that. > > -- Don Ireland On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 17:15:54 -0600, W2HX wrote: > >> > Wow! What can I say? I had been using 1.1 for a few years and never > >> > upgraded because I was running 4.2 on my 8310 > >> > > >> > I finally upgraded the bb and was able to get 2.0 working. What an > >> > incredible upgrade! So many new capabilities! Most important to me was > >> > switching identities at the time of composing the email. Really useful! > >> > > >> > One feature in the old version that was sorta semi-implemented that I > >> > was hoping would be fully implemented seems to be completely gone? > >> > Marking a message as unread. > >> > > >> > In the 1.1 version you could only mark a msg as unread (or unopened > >> > forget which) while you are reading the msg. most email tools (including > >> > the blackberry bes email client) allows that and also when you are > >> > looking at the list of messages. You could move the cursor ontop of the > >> > message and have a menu of options such as open the message or mark as > >> > unread. > >> > > >> > 1.1 did not allow marking the msg as unread from the msg list. So > >> > whenever I exited a msg and forgot to mark it, I would have to open it > >> > again, wait for it to download and then mark. > >> > > >> > Have I overlooked this function in 2.0? Its a really useful function > >> > because I use that to remind me to read more carefully or respond to an > >> > email (basically save for later) > >> > > >> > Thanks and again, what a massive improvement to the software! > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > 73 Eugene W2HX > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Colocation vs. Managed Hosting > A question and answer guide to determining the best fit > for your organization - today and in the future. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d > _______________________________________________ > Logicmail-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/logicmail-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Logicmail-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/logicmail-users
