On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Chris Capel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > More alice questions! Yay! > > The PEG groups {lahe dihu laha certu} as [{lahe (dihu laha)} <certu>]. > As I understand it, indictors like {la'a} do indeed attach to the word > on their left.
Right. > Does this mean that that sentence ought technically to > be {lahe dihu certu laha}, or {laha lahe dihu certu}? It depends what the intended meaning was. It could be that {la'a} does modify {di'u}. x1 of {certu} is supposed to be a person, so {la'e di'u} doesn't seem to make much sense there. If it was {jetnu} instead of {certu}, the difference would be someting like: la'a la'e di'u jetnu "Probably that's true." la'e di'u la'a jetnu "It's probably that which is true." >If my > understanding is correct, then I don't need to change my parser to be > less misleading. :) The parser is doing the right thing. The sentence doesn't seem to make sense with or without {la'a}. mu'o mi'e xorxes