I *think* that the first one is ok, although I would tend to say {da poi mi
viska cu xamgu}. {xamgu} is good. {gleki} is happy.
likewise, I *think* that the second one is ok, but again, I would find it
more natural to say {mi viska da poi citka ke'a}
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Ryan Leach <rsw.le...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are these how I would say the following
> 1. What I see is good
> 2. I see what is eaten
>
> 1. le mi se viska cu gleki
> 2. mi viska le se citka
>
> If not please advise.
>
> --
> “Nothing bothers me more than sloth. The objective is to fix mistakes
> of ambition and not make mistakes of sloth. I work my ass off.”
> -Tim Ferriss
>
>
>
>
