On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:57 PM, A. PIEKARSKI <to...@rogers.com> wrote:
> > > Geoffrey, > > You'll find an explanation as to why Canada isn't {kando} here: > > http://nuzban.wiw.org/archive/9110/msg00119.html > > totus > > > I didn't say {kando}... at least not just now. I said {kanko}, based of the slang term Canuck. It was already explained to me why {kando} was impossible. Anyway it's probably impossible to change it now at all, so this is just idle speculation. djefris. > > > > .i mi'e djefris. .i mi kadnu gi'e se bangu le > > glico .e le fraso .e le latmo > > to so'u toi .e le lojbo to ji'a so'u > > toi > > > > fi'i djefris. do pamoi lo'i kadno jbopre poi se > > sanji mi .i doi > drata jbopre do'u da xu drata kadno jbopre > > (Welcome, > > Geoffrey. You are first Canadian lojbanist that I'm aware > of. > > Hey, other lojbanists -- are there any other Candian lojbanists?) > > > You're not alone, Geoffrey. I live in Toronto. Welcome! >> >> totus >> >> >> >> Thank you! Nice to meet a fellow Canuck. > (Hmmm... if the fu'ivla for Canadian was based on Canuck it could have been > kanko instead, which doesn't seem to break any rules... just idle > speculation, of course.) > >