On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:57 PM, A. PIEKARSKI <to...@rogers.com> wrote:
>
>
> Geoffrey,
>
> You'll find an explanation as to why Canada isn't {kando} here:
>
> http://nuzban.wiw.org/archive/9110/msg00119.html
>
> totus
>
>
>
I didn't say {kando}... at least not just now. I said {kanko}, based of the
slang term Canuck. It was already explained to me why {kando} was
impossible. Anyway it's probably impossible to change it now at all, so this
is just idle speculation.
djefris.
> >
> > .i mi'e djefris. .i mi kadnu gi'e se bangu le
> > glico .e le fraso .e le latmo
> > to so'u toi .e le lojbo to ji'a so'u
> > toi
> >
>
> fi'i djefris. do pamoi lo'i kadno jbopre poi se
> > sanji mi .i doi
> drata jbopre do'u da xu drata kadno jbopre
>
> (Welcome,
> > Geoffrey. You are first Canadian lojbanist that I'm aware
> of.
> > Hey, other lojbanists -- are there any other Candian lojbanists?)
>
>
> You're not alone, Geoffrey. I live in Toronto. Welcome!
>>
>> totus
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you! Nice to meet a fellow Canuck.
> (Hmmm... if the fu'ivla for Canadian was based on Canuck it could have been
> kanko instead, which doesn't seem to break any rules... just idle
> speculation, of course.)
>
>
