On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeaber...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Ok, that makes sense.... mostly. BO takes the previous > word/construct/whatever and joins it in the shortest scope possible with the > following word/construct/whatever. And with {.ibabo} the previous sentence > implies that they (the two bridi) are connected by the {ba} and that the > {ba} is not modifying the following bridi in the normal (self-contained) > fashion.... am I right so far?
Right. ".i <tag> bo" is essentially the same as ".i bo" with an inserted tag. The whole of ".i <tag> bo" is the sentence connective, so the tag is no more a part of the second sentence than of the first. It is a part of the connective. mu'o mi'e xorxes