* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >we wanted sponsors to do a talk, preferably a techie doing it
>
> We asked quite a few times about this ... but it never quite
> happened. Obviously no-one thought Marty's lightning talk
> would really have gone down well... ;)
>
i wish i could of got it in, i tried to squeeze as many things in as
possible such as the perl 6 discussion, i even dropped my own talk for
it
> To be fair here, I think there's a reasonable degree of "fault"[1] on
> both sides. Things really were quite badly organised. We had to ask a lot
yup, but then again i think the organisers more than earned their
salaries for organising this ;-)
> of questions a lot of times to get answers. We got a lot less "coverage"
> at the actual event than we hoped for. But, a lot of that was our fault
> as well. It was our fault that we didn't get a load of goodies together
this is to be fixed in the upcoming high hit post conference
website/online proceedings
>
> Yes, we'd love the next conference to be a bit better organised, and to
> get more publicity from it, etc, etc, etc. But *really* what we want
as i said we hope to fix this with the preceedings
Greg
--
Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net
perl hacker | book collector | wannabee mailing list kook
London.pm - meetings held on the day after the first wednesday of the month
