this came up on another mailing list, doesn't 4 weeks pass quickly?
of course the writer is entirely wrong and Buffy is far better than Willow
----- Forwarded message from Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Authentication-Warning: happyfunball.pm.org: mjordomo set sender to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
From: Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: willow
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:37:55 +0200
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Precedence: bulk
Nothing like warming up an old discussion.
dave wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:58:35PM +0100, Greg McCarroll
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > so i put it you , willow is nothing but an ugly bird that all the
> > geeks fancy because they feel inadequate to consider buffy
>
> You're wrong and you know you are. The fact is that some of
> us are discerning enough to be interested in someone with
> some intelligence rather than a bimbo who simply conforms to
> societies sterotypes of attractiveness.
Besides, Willow is cuter than Buffy. (Says me, after finding an MPEG archive
of past Buffys.) And, for a first-time watcher, more recognisable: I had a
hard time recognising Buffy sometimes ("who's this girl in the scene? <10
mins later> Oh, *that's* Buffy").
*And* Willow is a hacker-type. Alyson Hannigan rules. And she even has her
own Appreciation Society: http://www.network23.com/hub/ahas/default.html .
Eat that!
Cheers,
Philip
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net
perl hacker | book collector | the very model of a modern mailing list kook
London.pm - meetings held on the day after the first wednesday of the month
