David Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > From: Piers Cawley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 10:06 AM > > > "Dave Cross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Well it looks like we might well have a space for the technical > > > meeting, so now I'd like to start thinking about what we'll do > > > at the meeting. > > > > > > My preference would be to have two or three longer talks and > > > half a dozen lightning talks. > > > > I can do a lightning job on the Interface-Polymorphism modules if you > > like. And I can always run another 12 step Perl session, but that's > > not exactly a technical talk is it? > > Either of these would be much appreciated. If we don't get enough volunteers I > may ask you to do both. Why have you taken to centre justifying replies I wonder? Any road up, note that 12 step perl is rather more than 5 minutes long... -- Piers
- Re: Technical Meeting - Call for Part... Greg McCarroll
- Re: Technical Meeting - Call for Participa... Neil Ford
- Re: Technical Meeting - Call for Part... Greg McCarroll
- Re: Technical Meeting - Call for ... Neil Ford
- Re: Technical Meeting - Call for ... Piers Cawley
- Re: Technical Meeting - Call for Participation David Cantrell
- Re: Technical Meeting - Call for Participation David Cantrell
- Re: Technical Meeting - Call for Participation Piers Cawley
- Re: Technical Meeting - Call for Participation Philip Newton
- Re: Technical Meeting - Call for Participation Greg McCarroll
- RE: Technical Meeting - Call for Participation David Cross
- Re: Technical Meeting - Call for Participation Dave Cross
- Re: Technical Meeting - Call for Participation Richard Clamp
- Re: Technical Meeting - Call for Participation Leon Brocard
- Re: Technical Meeting - Call for Participation Dave Cross
- Re: Technical Meeting - Call for Participation Tony Bowden
- Re: Technical Meeting - Call for Participation Greg McCarroll
- Re: Technical Meeting - Call for Participation Dave Cross
