Greg McCarroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Tied Timeouts get a CiP of ~~ which is high for a module, i dread to think > what the score of code would be that actually used this feature I've a feeling it might be "useful" in a %SIG handler.
- RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Marcel Grunauer
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Greg McCarroll
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Peter Corlett
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Leon Brocard
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Tony Bowden
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout David Cantrell
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Tony Bowden
- RE: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Dave Mee
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Tony Bowden
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout David Cantrell
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Peter Corlett
- Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout Paul Makepeace
