"Dave Cross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 11/1/00 1:44:28 PM
>
> >David Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> From: Piers Cawley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 10:06 AM
> >>
> >> > "Dave Cross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> >
> >> > > Well it looks like we might well have a space for the
>
> >> > > technical meeting, so now I'd like to start thinking
> >> > > about what we'll do at the meeting.
> >> > >
> >> > > My preference would be to have two or three longer
> >> > > talks and half a dozen lightning talks.
> >> >
> >> > I can do a lightning job on the Interface-Polymorphism
> >> > modules if you like. And I can always run another 12
> >> > step Perl session, but that's not exactly a technical
> >> > talk is it?
> >>
> >> Either of these would be much appreciated. If we don't
> >> get enough volunteers I may ask you to do both.
> >
> > Why have you taken to centre justifying replies I wonder?
>
> 'snot me - it's Outlook.
>
> > Any road up, note that 12 step perl is rather more than 5
> > minutes long...
>
> How does 20 minutes sound?
Fine. Assuming you all play your parts it'll be fun. Or I can practice
card tricks, which is *bound* to make you want to do the audience
participation thing instead.
--
Piers
