Greg McCarroll wrote:
> from comp.lang.functional ...
>
> > > Programming in statically typed languages is like having
> > > sex while being handcuffed. Some people think it's
> > > terribly exciting (and fair play to them!), but I find it
> > > rather restrictive. ;-)
Yeah, I saw that on rec.humor.best-of-usenet -- or, rather, a follow-up:
> "Albert Y. C. Lai" wrote:
> >
> > "felix" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Programming in statically typed languages is like having
> > > sex while being handcuffed. Some people think it's
> > > terribly exciting (and fair play to them!), but I find it
> > > rather restrictive. ;-)
> >
> > This thread is becoming hilarious. So programming in dynamically
> > typed languages is like having sex without being handcuffed? And
> > programming in general ...
>
>
> In any case, I found often that debugging Lisp is like being
> handcuffed without having sex. But is was also very exciting,
> you never knew what would be the next disaster.
Any Lispers around?
Cheers,
Philip
