* Roger Burton West ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 09:42:26AM +0000, Redvers Davies wrote: > >> my vote the one, the only ... Charlie's Angels > >That was a fun film and entertaining but I need more that kung fu and breasts > >to make a good 90 mins... > > That sounds almost... heretical. looking at the subject line, i can imagine Dick Hardt having arranged to have various perl mailing lists and newsgroups monitored by bots and him getting all excited as release 623 seems to be getting some good coverage in london.pm ;-) -- Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net
- Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623 Frontier
- Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623 Greg McCarroll
- Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623 David H. Adler
- Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623 Greg McCarroll
- Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623 David H. Adler
- Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623 Tony Bowden
- Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623 David H. Adler
- Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623 Robert Shiels
- Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623 Redvers Davies
- Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623 Roger Burton West
- Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623 Greg McCarroll
- Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623 Greg McCarroll
- Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623 Mark Fowler
- Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623 Benjamin Holzman
- Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623 Greg McCarroll
- Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623 David H. Adler
- Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623 Greg McCarroll
- Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623 Simon Wistow
- Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623 Mark Fowler
- Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623 Peter Corlett
- Re: Fwd: SPUG: ActivePerl 623 Simon Wistow