Dave Cross wrote:
> Ah. An idea. I'll send a test to the list and cc you and me, so that
> we can see what's going on. In fact, I'll do it with this mail.
Looks fine from over here. Here are the headers, in case you're interested:
Received: from mailgw5.gedas.de (139.1.44.13 [139.1.44.13]) by
exchange.datenrevision.de with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail
Service Version 5.5.2650.21)
id 1BHBQXMW; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:01:14 +0100
Received: from lists.dircon.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailgw5.gedas.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA04106
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:51:45
+0100 (MET)
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by lists.dircon.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA04238
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:56:17 GMT
X-Authentication-Warning: lists.dircon.co.uk: majordom set sender to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
Received: from zeus.powerhost.co.uk ([209.207.238.96])
by lists.dircon.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA03952
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:55:51 GMT
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
by zeus.powerhost.co.uk (8.9.3/(dn/norelay)) id JAA00915
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:54:50 -0500
(EST)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:54:50 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DMP Availability
References:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Dave Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Jonathan Stowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: ms-webmail
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers,
Philip
--
Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
