Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module.

[Roger Burton West]

On or about Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 12:24:38PM -0500, Chris Devers typed:

>Would a CPAN replacement have to be "drop-in"? I can see the argument behind making 
>replacements for MSA code be functionally identical in most visible ways, but when 
>you're dealing with CPAN code, presumably, you're dealing with somewhat more savvy 
>programmers that could handle having to tweak a few things to get a replacement up & 
>running. 

When you're dealing with the sort of programmers who would choose to use
this module in the first place...?

Roger