On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote: > Which is the ISO standard (number 8601) for dates for a very good > reason. > > Dave... > [who actually prefers YYYYMMDD because it sorts numerically] ISO8601 allows YYYYMMDD too (IIRC). Tony
- RE: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Mark Fowler
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. David Cantrell
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. David H. Adler
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Marty Pauley
- Balding Badly-Coiffed Hackers (... Jonathan Stowe
- Balding Badly-Coiffed Hackers (... Jonathan Stowe
- Re: Balding Badly-Coiffed H... David H. Adler
- RE: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Simon Wilcox
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Alex Page
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Dave Cross
- ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Writt... AEF
- ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Writt... Simon Wilcox
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Bad... Dave Cross
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Bad... AEF
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Bad... David Cantrell
- RE: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Chris Devers
- RE: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Simon Batistoni
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Paul Mison
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Matthew Robinson
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Ian Brayshaw
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Matthew Byng-Maddick