At 17:51 22/03/2001 +0100, Philip Newton wrote: >Simon Wilcox wrote: > > Or even better YY-MM-DD which avoids cross-pond confusion. > >Oh yeah? Which year, month, and day are represented by the combination >02-03-04? Depends on the side of the pond, and on which pond (MM-DD-YY in >US, DD-MM-YY in UK, possibly YY-MM-DD in Japan). I admit I suffered from speedy-reply syndrome. A moments more thought and I would probably have recognized the need for a 4-digit year. But at least I learned about ISO8601 :-) Simon. -- "The avalanche has started, it is too late for the pebbles to vote." Ambassador Kosh, B5
- RE: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Simon Batistoni
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Paul Mison
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Matthew Robinson
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Ian Brayshaw
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. David Cantrell
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Simon Cozens
- RE: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Andrew Bowman
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Philip Newton
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. David Cantrell
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Simon Wilcox
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Philip Newton
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Dave Cross
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. David Cantrell