Friday, April 27, 2001, 1:09:05 PM, Robin Szemeti wrote: RS> but in the end (assuming that both RS> codesets use similar basic principles) you will not beat the speed of C RS> with anything other than hand optimised assembler. Now that is a fact. Sounds much more like a function of the compiler to me. A really good Fortran compiler would turn out faster code than a bad c compiler. Granted, it is a *lot* easier to write a fast c compiler, since you're already halfway to assembler anyway. Now if you're just comparing any fully compiled language with java, you're absolutely right. -- mike
- TPC5 Attendees Barbie
- Re: MySQL -> Oracle wrapper/compat. libs Piers Cawley
- Re: MySQL -> Oracle wrapper/compat. libs Paul Makepeace
- Re: MySQL -> Oracle wrapper/compat. libs Robin Szemeti
- Re: MySQL -> Oracle wrapper/compat. libs Paul Makepeace
- Re: MySQL -> Oracle wrapper/compat. libs Robin Szemeti
- Re: MySQL -> Oracle wrapper/compat. libs Mark Fowler
- Re: MySQL -> Oracle wrapper/compat. libs Leon Brocard
- Re: MySQL -> Oracle wrapper/compat. libs Simon Cozens
- Re: MySQL -> Oracle wrapper/compat. libs Robin Szemeti
- Re: MySQL -> Oracle wrapper/compat. libs Mike Jarvis
- Re: MySQL -> Oracle wrapper/compat. libs Paul Makepeace
- Re: MySQL -> Oracle wrapper/compat. libs Mike Jarvis
- Re: MySQL -> Oracle wrapper/compat. libs Brad Bowman
- Re: MySQL -> Oracle wrapper/compat. libs Leon Brocard
- Re: MySQL -> Oracle wrapper/compat. libs Robin Szemeti
