What he said.
I think the snappy, fun summaries Leon produces are very cool (groovy
even) but not necessarily web page fodder since the web page has a
different audience who probably can't understand/appreciate the social
context.
FWIW, I actually took mild issue with the templating summary and its
apparent finality but didn't comment; but since it's come up I'd concur
it felt premature. *Any* prescription of a single solution, except
in very extreme category-killing cases, is on general principles
inappropriate. I don't believe TT is a category killer nor in a sense
can be because it doesn't have a tightly enough defined domain.
Paul
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:21:40AM +0100, Matthew Robinson wrote:
>
> Before I respond to the comments Leon made to Ian I think I would like to
> point out this isn't really a discussion about which templating system is
> best. It is actually about the way the knowledge of the group is distilled
> for inclusion in an FAQ on the groups website.
>
> I will respond to a number of Leon's points below but given that I am
> (metaphorically) walking through extremely dry bush carrying a flamethrower
> I want to summarise a number of points up front so they aren't misread,
> skipped, taken out of context etc.
snip..
