On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:09:41PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote: > I've just started work on a personal project which will make heavy use > of serialised objects. The logical way to store these, IMO, is with > MLDBM*. You just don't want to do that. Everyone I've ever heard from that's gone down the *DBM route has regretted it in all but the most trivial read-only or single-app case. Locking, concurrency, odd gotchas. And actually it isn't all that fast. I just wouldn't bother. Go straight to the RDBMS. Bear in mind in some cases (notably Oracle, and MySQL can be made to fly too) Perl is the limiting factor, not the database. YMMV, IMO, etc Paul -- Towards the insignificant
- Divorcing data storage from business logic David Cantrell
- Re: Divorcing data storage from business logic Paul Makepeace
- Re: Divorcing data storage from business logic Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: Divorcing data storage from business logic Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: Divorcing data storage from business logic Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: Divorcing data storage from business logic Dave Hodgkinson
- RE: Divorcing data storage from business logic Richard Clyne
- Re: Divorcing data storage from business logic Paul Makepeace
- Re: Divorcing data storage from business log... David Cantrell
- Re: Divorcing data storage from business logic Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: Divorcing data storage from business log... Redvers Davies
- RE: Divorcing data storage from business logic Lee Goddard