On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Rafiq Ismail (ADMIN) wrote: > We've got this Mason only, bosses pet, who is trying to challange our > decision to rebuild a site in Template, as opposed to Mason.
Well, I've built a CMS in TT and very easy it was too but not what you'd call a major site. The largest site I can think of if, of course, slashdot, and there are lots of slash derived sites. Your decision comes down to (a) what are your costs for training people in TT or Mason; (b) How much you want to disengage the logic processing from the presentation. TT is very good at keeping logic (i.e. perl code) away from the presentation. This can be a good thing or a bad thing depending on the resources you have available and your personal preference. I am more familar with TT and would use that in almost all situations. YMMV. > "__ __ _ __ __ > | \/ | ___ __| | ___ _ __ _ __ | \/ | __ _ _ __ > | |\/| |/ _ \ / _` |/ _ \ '__| '_ \| |\/| |/ _` | '_ \ > | | | | (_) | (_| | __/ | | | | | | | | (_| | | | | > |_| |_|\___/ \__,_|\___|_| |_| |_|_| |_|\__,_|_| |_| > a pathetic example of his organic heritage" > - Bad Religion ETOOBIGSIG ! Simon. -- "Zaphod old mate, I trust you as far as I could comfortably spit out a rat"
