> >> No. The rate's terrible. And I mean *really* terrible. > > > > That's what I was thinking. They're paying bad salary rates but for a > > contract-length period. > > Hell yes.
£2033 after tax per month for three months. Some people would love to be earning that much lately (i.e. better than £0 per month). Then again, it's in London, so I'd steer well clear myself. Pete
