I know that the subject of corporate disclaimers comes up from
time to time. I was wondering whether a general solution might be a good idea.
If the mailing list code looks for a particular <TAG> ... </TAG>,
and distributes only the text between the tags, that would be quite useful -
certainly to me.
If the message contains no <TAG> pair, or the pair is
syntactically incorrect, the entire message is distributed as per what happens
at present. I am also stuck for a tag name.
My present client has a dickslammer which takes the biscuit,
and includes the words: "If you are not an intended recipient please delete
this e-mail and notify postmaster@$Corporate" . Yeouch!!
Not only that, but the mails are also prefixed with a banner saying "Please read
the disclaimer below".
I am currently subscribed in lurk mode at $Corporate, and
digest mode at $Home; living in trepidation of inadvertantly replying on-list,
and having the instructions taken literally.
From a legal perspective, the purpose of a mailing list
address is to send the message to a _COMPUTER_, and the blurb about the
intended recipient surely does not apply, as the recipient COMPUTER is not in
itself capable of copying, disclosing, deleting or any other activity outside
what it has been instructed to do. The fact that I have
instructed the computer to extract a tagged snippet and forward just the snippet
does not invalidate any confidences. It would be just the same if I had a
human slave scribe sitting outside the corporate network, obeying my
instructions to cut and paste the section and distribute this to a list of
subscribers.
Has anybody done this already? How easy for someone to embrace
the snake and patch Mailman for london.pm? What about other list managers, e.g.
ezmlm?
What do others think? Am I tilting at
wind(mill|ow)s?
Ivor.
|
- Re: Mailing list topping and tailing Ivor Williams
- Re: Mailing list topping and tailing Jonathan Peterson
- Re: Mailing list topping and tailing Christof Damian
- Re: Mailing list topping and tailing Steve Keay
- Re: Mailing list topping and tailing Nicholas Clark
- Re: Mailing list topping and tailing Steve Keay