On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 12:54:45PM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:45 PM, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 11:17:16PM +0000, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > > > >> Apparently Java is dead too: > >> http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=python%2C+perl%2C+java%2C+php&l=&relative=1 > > > > So's C. And Windows. > > http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=narcotics%2C+php&l=&relative=1 At least we're still more popular than Jesus: http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=jesus%2C+perl&l=&relative=1 >
- Re: Perl is dead James Laver
- Re: Perl is dead Avleen Vig
- Re: Perl is dead Jonathan Stowe
- Re: Perl is dead Abigail
- Re: Perl is dead Stefano Rodighiero
- Re: Perl is dead Michele Beltrame
- Re: Perl is dead breno
- Re: Perl is dead Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: Perl is dead David Cantrell
- Re: Perl is dead Kent Fredric
- Re: Perl is dead jesse
- Re: Perl is dead Zbigniew Lukasiak
- Re: Perl is dead Jonathan Stowe
- Re: Perl is dead Léon Brocard
- Re: Perl is dead Zbigniew Lukasiak
- Re: Perl is dead Billy Abbott
- Re: Perl is dead Michele Beltrame
- Re: Perl is dead Sebastian Riedel
- Re: Perl is dead Adeola Awoyemi
- Re: Perl is dead Zbigniew Lukasiak
- Re: Perl is dead ben