On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 05:39:23PM +0530, abhishek jain wrote: [...] > Any solution one can think of in regards to the compression,
Not really, because we don't know what the source data is beyond it being 300-400 characters. Theory states it's impossible to compress all strings into smaller strings - and wishing otherwise will not make it work in practice - so you're going to have to narrow it down a bit for us. Also, what do you mean by "characters"? Do you mean "bytes" or some other encoding? What you're trying to do seems quite muddled and smells doomed to failure to me.