On 11 Mar 2011, at 10:28, Andy Armstrong wrote: >>> Yeah, it's pretty easy to whack that pipeline together (if you have the >>> bits in both senses). Linux laptop, webcam, ffmpeg, script in $language, >>> server. >> >> And when we have a meeting in a Pub with no internet? - or the venu doesn't >> allow non-employees on their network - etc etc etc > > Then it doesn't work :) > >> I'm not sure what the advantage of a live webcast is over someone uploading >> it >> the next day? It would also be better to have it available for >> posterity rather than just live (I'm sure both >> could be done). > > I suppose if you have a live webcast you can then have a distributed Q&A > session after the talk. > > To be clear I'm saying it'd be a fun thing to do - I'm not suggesting that > it's going to significantly improve the quality of anyone's life.
I had enough people saying they wished they could have been there to lead me to believe the audience would have been much larger.