On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 11:48 +0100, Andy Armstrong wrote: > Yup - completely agree. This is one of the reasons I like the ::Tiny > namespace so much. > > And the transient dependency explosion - and subsequent burden of updating > those dependencies - i.e. the TCO of a Perl app - is the main reason we're > not favouring Perl for new applications at the Beeb.
So how are you handling the requirement to maintain the code doing what those many modules do? If you are not using a modular approach does that have any impact upon the TCO of maintaining the systems you are deploying?
