On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:31:16AM +0100, Roger Burton West wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:28:27PM -0400, Mark Fowler wrote: > > >Here's my longer drawn out version, stolen from YAPC::NA's code of conduct. > >Comments on this are genuinely welcome, and I'll leave it to the current > >London.pm leader to make a call on what exactly we should adopt (if anything) > > > >Code of Conduct > > My feeling is that this is far too long and offputting. "If they have to > specify all this in nitpicking detail, it's because they've got people > who are trying to game the system and they don't have the guts to throw > them out." I'd much rather have a mostly-benevolent dictatorship which > is able to treat cases as individual matters than a huge set of rules > which still won't cover all eventualities.
"won't cover all eventualities" I think is nicely confirmed with: On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:34:34AM +0100, David Hodgkinson wrote: > And I don't think a mental image of Gillian Keith masturbating falls under > any of that. Collateral damage maybe. Ho hum. That is not exactly something I want to think about, let alone look at. But that might just be me. Nicholas Clark