Apparently the Easter Quoll (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_quoll) is a good replacement for a cat. However the australian regulatory environment makes this very difficult to do.
On 20/06/2013, at 5:55 AM, Paul Makepeace <pa...@paulm.com> wrote: > Wow, and I thought Oakland (California) was permissive allowing us, in > a large (~1M pop.) city, to keep cows and horses. You need an acre > minimum for a horse, but so long as you can demonstrate adequate > manure processing capacity, cows are a go. > > Where is this fabulous discussion happening? Is there any urban > precedent for water buffalo, or camels, in .NL? > > Paul > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Dirk Koopman <d...@tobit.co.uk> wrote: >> It appears that my esteemed government has changed the rules about about >> which pets one might keep at home. Apart from all the usual suspects, it >> appears one may keep a water buffalo but, crucially, one will *not* be able >> to keep a camel. Apparently, camels are dirty, disease ridden animals but >> water buffaloes (by definition) must be clean and (contagious) disease free. >> >> Given the respective O'Reilly colophons ("MSCE Core Elective Exams in a >> Nutshell" and er.. the Camel Book) what does this all mean? >> Dirk