? 2012-2-19 11:00, Danny Clark ??:
Thought someone on this list might be able to answer Matt's questions
regarding gcc and the loongson processor.
I have talked to ICT compiler team for this work. I thing situation
will be better soon.
Regards
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *Matt Turner* <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 5:50 PM
Subject: [loongson-dev] gcc loongson vector intrinsics
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Hi,
gcc's support for loongson vector intrinsics is very bad. Consider gcc
bugs 42951, 48068, 48348.
There's no way to generate instructions like and, or, xor, shift that
operate on full 64-bit doublewords without using inline assembly.
Is anyone working on fixing this? Where are the Lemote developers?
(Also, to my knowledge gcc-4.5 doesn't even compile on mipsel/n64: gcc
bug 45941)
Matt
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "loongson-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
<mailto:loongson-dev%[email protected]>.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/loongson-dev?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"loongson-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/loongson-dev?hl=en.
