Thanks for reply.. yeah its definitely worth of fixing up.. i tried to find the way, but too difficult for me without knowing lovd internals much :/
would it be possible not to create the 3rd feed when status changes from PENDING->ACCEPTED but instead only update the fields (status, etc). Then when one stops being friends the status could be changed back? just an idea.. Tair On Sep 8, 4:44 am, Jason Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't looked at the code but it seems that it's not that there are > duplicates, it is the status of the relationship has changed and the feed > is based on that. Not a bug so much as an oversight I think. If you stop > being freinds, the feed shows three identicle recent activity listings. > This doesn't show a true history, but I haven't got the code in front of me > to see what's happening. In this case the relationship status should > possibly be stored in the feeds table in the database. > > Definitely worth fixing up. > > Jason > On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 00:55:02 -0700 (PDT), AssimovT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > I have also attached the data. Please check "!!!" marks near the rows > > that are duplicate. I also understand those might be needed to enable > > remaining a follower after friendship is broken ... > > >http://www.pastie.org/267133 > > > On Sep 6, 10:41 am, AssimovT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Actually, I have found another bug.. > > >> Consider, l have two test users, not friends yet: Peter and Mike. > > >> - Peter starts following Mike. Mike's dashboard shows: Peter is now a > >> follower of Mike. > >> - Mike becomes a friend with Peter. Mike's dashboard shows: Peter is > >> now a friend of Mike x 2 times. And it doesn't show the previous > >> feed(that he is a follower). > > >> Do you know why this is happening? > > >> Tair > > >> On Sep 1, 9:47 pm, "Steven A Bristol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > > >> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:41 AM, AssimovT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > Hi > > >> > > I am trying to add pagination to feed_items and have noticed that > >> > > method: > > >> > > def partial > >> > > item.class.name.underscore > >> > > end > > >> > > sometimes returns nil, even if there is already the same type of > >> > > feed_item. This causes unequal paging results. > > >> > > Is there any way to fix it? And why is it happening? > > >> > > Thanks, > > >> > > Tair. > > >> > I'm not sure why that would ever return nil. Can you give a code > >> > example with data? > > >> > steve --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lovd by Less" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lovdbyless?hl=en Who loves ya baby? -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
