thanks for suggestion.. i have almost moved to s3 (still needs some testing) with paperclip, so with this solution (or db stored images) direct access is not a problem, i suppose
Cheers, Tair On Oct 28, 4:33 pm, Sazima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Tair, > > How's fraced going? > > Take a look at Orkut's approach. It's something between the full > security you want and what you have now in Lovd. The pictures are > accessible through a direct URL, but the URL is almost impossible to > figure out (long and random file name). And to get the link in the > user's album, you first need to have access to it anyway: > > src="http://images.orkut.com/orkut/albums2/ > ATgAAABve33JCU4gcFvujl2ts83HFWllGoxdN4mat_XDZEDcjUDU5RzKN4sg8LKW8khxs16- > lbPIBJfrJenHKCu1EOzAAJtU9VDb2TK86KKX-9nYFqCKG8DFhFzkeg.jpg" > > Cheers, Sazima > > On Oct 27, 12:37 pm, AssimovT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hiya > > > Does anyone know the ways of restricting direct access to user > > uploaded photos? > > > Rgs, > > > Tair. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lovd by Less" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lovdbyless?hl=en Who loves ya baby? -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
