Hi Ingo,

k8s was one of the hardest aspects of the proposal. The main rationale for
how the draft looks like now is that k8s is, at least for now, technically
not a container runtime but an orchestration tool. We do cover Docker, as
it is useful on its own, too, so candidates show their proficiency in
containerization in its original definition. Regarding k8s, we could aim
for several potential approaches: We could cover handling objects in k8s
(most of the stuff that goes into a yaml file to be used with kubectl
apply), but that would leave the field of virtualization and enter the
field of application design. We do cover this in the DevOps Tools Enginner
exam and I'm not sure if a Linux Virtualization expert would actually deal
with Deployments and PVCs. We could also cover the administration of k8s
which, however, could be an exam on its own. Since we're talking about
LPIC-3, we would certainly have to discuss specific storage classes,
networking plugins or go into details of kube-proxy implementation and
kubelet parameters. We would also probably consider kubeadm, although my
impression is that the majority of productive clusters either run in the
cloud or are deployed using higher level management tools such as Rancher,
kops, kubespray, you name it. Squeezing all this into one aspect of several
aspects within one exam doesn't seem to work out easily. That's why the
proposal tests k8s deep enough to be sure the candidates are aware of it
and its major principles, but does not require any in-depth knowledge about
either of its these.

So much for the rationale of the draft. How much kubernetes would you like
to see in the exam personally? And what does the rest think? We can change
the draft in any directions, but we should be sure to consider the
relevance of the topics and the effort of learning/training it.

Fabian


On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 10:53 AM Ingo Wichmann <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Fabian,
>
> I don't find Kubernetes in any of the Objectivs.
>
> Ingo
>
> Am 05.03.19 um 10:01 schrieb Fabian Thorns:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > there are finally some news on how we might proceed with 304. Thanks to
> > all of you who shared their thoughts on this, I had some really good
> > discussions and the overall decision how to handle Virtualization and
> > High Availability in the future isn't that easy. The only common
> > denominator in all these discussions was the wish to separate these
> > topics. So, here is a proposal on a pure virtualization 304 exam:
> >
> >   https://wiki.lpi.org/wiki/LPIC-304_Objectives_V3.0
> >
> > The diff to 304 version 3.0 is here:
> >
> >
> https://wiki.lpi.org/pubwiki/index.php?title=LPIC-304_Objectives_V3.0&type=revision&diff=&oldid=5108
> >
> > We now have an additional topic on container virtualization as well as
> > another new topic about tools such as Packer, cloud-init and Vagrant.
> > The latter topic is closely related to the DevOps Tools Engineer exam,
> > but, just as the container topic, is intended for Linux Ops and won't be
> > suitable for Devs, as we will go into great technical detail in LPIC-3.
> >
> > As usual, I hope for your feedback and comments. It's a first shot, it
> > certainly needs fine tuning.
> >
> > Oh, and in case you're wondering what happened to High Availability...
> > stay tuned :)
> >
> > Fabian
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 2:06 PM Ortwin Ebhardt <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hello,
> >
> >     while I can easily see this working with virtualization and storage
> >     (multipath and iscsi would be something to add here), I am note
> >     quite sure about HA; that may come from the fact that I do not know
> >     so many HA solutions, but apart from Load Balancers and Heartbeat
> >     acutaully nothin comes to my mind. Would that be enough for a hole
> exam?
> >     There would, of course, be the possibility to include HA on base of
> >     tomcat or galera clusters - but wouldn't that go to much into
> >     applications?
> >
> >
> >     Best regards,
> >
> >     Ortwin
> >
> >     Ortwin Ebhardt
> >
> >     Senior Consultant
> >
> >
> >     Capricorn Consulting GmbH
> >     An Krietes Park 6
> >     28307 Bremen
> >
> >
> >     Telefon: +49 421 98981-642
> >
> >     E-Mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >
> >     Internet: www.capricorn.de <https://www.capricorn.de/>
> >
> >     Jetzt neu: IT News von Capricorn. Kompakt – Aktuell - Direkt.
> >     Anmeldung unter www.capricorn.de <http://www.capricorn.de>
> >
> >     Geschäftsführer: Thomas Bargfrede, Dipl.-Ing. Axel Buschmann,
> >     Thomas von Massenbach, Thomas Heuermann
> >     Registergericht: Amtsgericht Bremen, HRB 31421
> >
> >
> >     Unsere Informationspflicht nach Art. 13 DSGVO finden Sie hier
> >     <https://www.capricorn.de/datenschutz-kurz.html>
> >
> >     *Hinweis*
> >
> >     Diese elektronische Nachricht ist vertraulich und ausschließlich für
> >     den Adressaten bestimmt. Falls Sie nicht der beabsichtigte Empfänger
> >     der Nachricht sind, ist jede Veröffentlichung,
> >     Vervielfältigung, Verbreitung oder Nutzung des Inhalts der Nachricht
> >     verboten.
> >     Falls Sie die Nachricht versehentlich erhalten haben, informieren
> >     Sie die Capricorn Consulting GmbH bitte
> >     unverzüglich telefonisch oder per E-Mail.
> >
> >     This electronic mail is intended to be for the use of the individual
> >     or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of the
> >     information, be aware that any disclosure, copying,
> >     distribution or use of the contents of this information is
> >     prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail in error,
> >     please notify the Capricorn Consulting GmbH by telephone or email.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     *Von:* [email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>> im Auftrag von Fabian Thorns
> >     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >     *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 18. November 2018 13:59:27
> >     *An:* This is the lpi-examdev mailing list.
> >     *Betreff:* Re: [lpi-examdev] LPIC-304 Objectives
> >
> >     Hi there,
> >
> >     thanks for all your comments. It seems there is a general agreement
> >     that 304 should be split, and that the building blocks of whatever
> >     comes out of it are virtualization, high availability and storage.
> >     We've already mentioned ceph and in a side conversation fibrechannel
> >     was mentioned, but i was wondering what else should be added to the
> >     three baskets (virtualization, HA, storage). We need to get a first
> >     idea of the possible amount of content of each topic to see what
> >     could potentially make up an own exam.
> >
> >     If you have new topics in mind for any of those three categories,
> >     please share them here.
> >
> >     Fabian
> >
> >
> >     On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 4:38 PM Fabian Thorns <[email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >         Hi there,
> >
> >         let's discuss exam 304 in this thread.
> >
> >         The current objectives are available here:
> >
> >           https://wiki.lpi.org/wiki/LPIC-304_Objectives_V2
> >
> >         Some of you raised the following points in private conversations:
> >
> >         - Container virtualization, i.e. Docker
> >         - Storage (i.e. Ceph, with respect to both HA and
> virtualization)?
> >         - Notwork HA (bonding)
> >         - Is it still worth having a combined HA and virtualization
> >         certification?
> >
> >         I'm sure there is more to discuss, so just follow up with
> >         whatever you have in mind :)
> >
> >         Fabian
> >
> >         --
> >         Fabian Thorns <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> GPG:
> >         F1426B12
> >         Director of Certification Development, Linux Professional
> Institute
> >
> >
> >
> >     --
> >     Fabian Thorns <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> GPG:
> F1426B12
> >     Director of Certification Development, Linux Professional Institute
> >
> >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     lpi-examdev mailing list
> >     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Fabian Thorns <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> GPG: F1426B12
> > Director of Certification Development, Linux Professional Institute
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lpi-examdev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
> >
>
> --
> Linuxhotel GmbH, Geschäftsführer Dipl.-Ing. Ingo Wichmann
> HRB 20463 Amtsgericht Essen, UStID DE 814 943 641
> Antonienallee 1, 45279 Essen, Tel.: 0201 8536-600,
> http://www.linuxhotel.de
>


-- 
Fabian Thorns <[email protected]> GPG: F1426B12
Director of Certification Development, Linux Professional Institute
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to