Bo Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I haven't written an LPI exam, so I don't know specifically what the
> waiver consists of (although I would guess it is more of a
> non-disclosure agreement, not a waiver).
Correct.
> However, it will be very difficult to discuss future exam objectives via
> this mailing list if we can't ask questions and give answers to exam
> objectives.
>
> I was under the impression that this list is designed to openly discuss
> which topics should or should not be possible future exam objectives.
> I didn't imagine that this list was intended to determine who was
> prepared to write LPIC exams.
Of course we can discuss this stuff. What we cannot discuss is specific
content of exams.
So come on the list and ask, "Is XYZ covered on the exam?" but don't ask "I
got a question on the exam like XYZ and I think the two correct answers
should be ABC and DEF. What do you guys think?"
> As with all mailing lists, tempers can flare when intent isn't clear.
> Remember the golden rule of sending emails to a group: write once, read
> thrice, and only then hit send!
One of my favourites is Hanlon's Razor:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon's_razor
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by
stupidity.
Regards,
--
g. matthew rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> starnix care, toronto, ontario, ca
phone: 647.722.5301 x242 gpg id: EF9AAD20
http://www.starnix.com professional linux services & products
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
