"Bryan J. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > From: G. Matthew Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Well, I'm confused. > > Once I got into the office at my client, I smacked myself in > the forehead. Why? Not only does RHEL 5 have LUKS via the > dm-crypt/setup facilities, RHEL 4 has the pre-LUKS facilities > as well. A few of my colleagues in Red Hat then smacked me > again, especially some of the DM guys, because Red Hat has > been shipping and supporting in RHEL for over 3 years, and > Fedora for almost 5.
Right, I remember that e-mail now. It was another long one :) > > > I didn't add anything to do with FUSE, sshfs, etc, > > though. Anyone want to argue for those? > > Any security exam should build on other foundation. So > consider adding the DeviceMapper foundation into other > exams, like LPIC-1/2 for the next revision. Although if > security-centric, yeah, it's a consideration. The device mapper (not libdevmapper.so, just /dev/mapper) is mentioned in the LVM objective in LPIC-2. In the new objectives for April, at least. Regards, -- g. matthew rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> starnix care, toronto, ontario, ca phone: 647.722.5301 x242 gpg id: EF9AAD20 http://www.starnix.com professional linux services & products _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
