[email protected] wrote: > Send lpi-examdev mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of lpi-examdev digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: How much history is enough? [was Re: [lpi-examdev] LPI > objective 103.1: Shell command history] (G. Matthew Rice) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: 17 Dec 2008 08:42:47 -0500 > From: "G. Matthew Rice" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: How much history is enough? [was Re: [lpi-examdev] LPI > objective 103.1: Shell command history] > To: "This is the lpi-examdev mailing list." <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen) writes: >> So anything other than knowing about 'history' and .bash_history has >> nothing to do with administration, only efficiency. As a result I >> wouldn't include it at all. It is simply not relevant. > > I haven't seen any more comments on this topic for a while so I'm going to > leave the addendum as: > > > > https://group.lpi.org/publicwiki/bin/view/Examdev/LPIC-10x#Next_Addendum_Jan_1st_2009 > > - add .bash_history to 103.1 to key terms list
Sounds good. I just checked, and it turns out that I already had this covered in my own training course. Does that make me prescient? ;) _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
