On 10-09-13 08:23 PM, Daniel Curry wrote: > Sounds a lot like MTAs and MUAs.
The Linux MTA landscape have pretty much converged toward Postfix, with Sendmail being an important legacy. Exim and Courier are really just minor players in that space, and should probably not be covered in the exam IMHO. The MUA situation is, indeed, all over the place and I am not sure they are worth being covered in the exam either (would there be question on Thunderbird? Mutt? Evolution? Pine?). In a nutshell, if it was my call, I would have this exam cover: - Postfix in depth; - Sendmail in depth, focusing on the traditional interface, and possibly covering milter (although I am not entirely sure about that); - Courier and Exim in passing; - MUA not at all, except for some knowledge of the the traditional mail command. But that is just my 0,02$. > On 9/13/2010 6:18 PM, Etienne Goyer wrote: >> >>> Webmail systems such as squirrelmail, Horde, RoundCube and the like >>> should also be added as clients. >> This is a hard call. There is no clear leader in the webmail >> application space, and it changes all the time. I would leave it out of >> the objectives. >> _______________________________________________ >> lpi-examdev mailing list >> lpi-examdev@lpi.org >> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev > > _______________________________________________ > lpi-examdev mailing list > lpi-examdev@lpi.org > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
