On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Anselm Lingnau <[email protected]> wrote: > Contrary to what many people, including the authors of various LPI prep books, > seem to think, the order in which topics are listed in the objectives is *not* > actually the one single officially-allowed order in which these topics must > absolutely be taught. (The same applies to the objectives themselves.) > > Feel free to teach the material in whatever order you think is best, no matter > what the objectives say. Nobody will mind one way or the other. > > Anselm
Yes the objectives have come a LONG way since the first and second iterations, and with a lot of trainer input they continue to get better. You know, One COULD and some DO teach straight from the objectives in the order they are listed, but... Anselm, and the other silver-backs here will likely concur that in the world of a professional trainer, that won't last too long, trainers start switching things around a little in their classes to get the exact right mix for the attendees flow of learning, and even that changes some from class to class. In short, as a trainer or someone who is studying for the LPIC using the objectives as their guide, be flexible and be sure to cover and study ALL of the items. Ross - Author, Trainer, Geek [email protected] _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
