Hi Matt, I agree, yes to CIDR and VLSM and keep Class A, B, C networks dropped.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]> To: This is the lpi-examdev mailing list. <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, Jul 15, 2014 5:36 pm Subject: Re: [lpi-examdev] Status of LPIC-1, LPIC-304 and Linux Essentials Objectives On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Bryan J Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > So _everyone_ needs to know Class A, B and C if they are going to remotely > do any DNS administration. So it's best to introduce them with their CIDR > for IPv4. DNS servers/reverse records are part of LPIC-2, though. LPIC-1 is about being a consumer of DNS services. So, final vote guys: - explicitly mention CIDR notation? (I've always considered it a given) - explicitly mention VLSM? (also always considered it a given) - include Class A, B, C networks? (we used to have it but dropped it; I always considered it a little bit of an archaic way of referring to subnets; plus internal networks don't care and most people have their public IPs assigned/subnetted for them) TTYL, --matt -- G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]> gpg id: EF9AAD20 _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
