On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:48 AM, G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Bryan J Smith <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Preach it brother. ;) > > I guess I've been told. :) > -- > G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]> gpg id: EF9AAD20 > Sorry Matt, I just couldn't believe someone was agreeing with me. I'm not used to people going to the "same church" as me. ;) In any case, just so there is no misunderstanding, in my openly _subjective_ view ... - _Both_ ifconfig/netstat/route _and_ ip/ss should be covered in LPI The only other point, non-LPI, that I was adding was, in the context of "scripts" which one person brought up, and another corrected -- I siding with the latter ... - People should _not_ use ifconfig/route in scripts, but ip instead But that latter part is not really LPI's focus. -- bjs
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
