On 04/12/2014 alle 21:11, G. Matthew Rice wrote:
> Okay, guys. Have a look at the diffs on the wiki. I only made the
> changes for the latest versions. Either the current ones or the ones
> that are in beta (LE, LPIC-1 and 304):
>
>
> http://wiki.lpi.org/pubwiki/index.php?title=LinuxEssentials_Objectives_V1.5&action=historysubmit&diff=3219&oldid=3212
>
> http://wiki.lpi.org/pubwiki/index.php?title=LPIC-1_Objectives_V4&action=historysubmit&diff=3228&oldid=3204
>
> http://wiki.lpi.org/pubwiki/index.php?title=LPIC-2&action=historysubmit&diff=3244&oldid=3213
>
> http://wiki.lpi.org/pubwiki/index.php?title=LPIC-3_300_Objectives_V1&action=historysubmit&diff=3247&oldid=2790
As far as I checked it looks all right to me.
The latest Bryan wrote makes me wonder what he thinks is the best for lines
like this:
Content of /, /boot/ , and /lib/modules/
Is it all right the way it is, or should it become:
/, /boot and /lib/modules
(/boot I level dir, /lib/modules well-known dir) or maybe this?
/, /boot and /lib/modules/
(/boot I level dir, /lib/modules just some dir)
> NB:
> http://wiki.lpi.org/wiki/LPIC-1_Objectives_V4#102.1_Design_hard_disk_layout
> I didn't update the /var, /boot, /home entries as they're referring to
> mount points/file systems. I have no strong opinion either way on
> matter, though. Anyone?
Neither do I have strong opinions about it.
> NB2: I didn't remove the trailing periods in the 300 exam
> objectives...Although, I think that we should.
I agree they are both useless and "unpretty".
> Regards,
> --matt
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Bryan J Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>> American and Canadians
>> ... agreeing together
>> ... mass hysteria
>>
>> Enough! ;)
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:32 AM, G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Bryan J Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> I _never_ remove something that _adds_ context. That only _increases_
>>>> ambiguity, which is _never_ good.
>>>>
>>>> So we should append "/" as appropriate on directories in the objectives,
>>>> instead of removing it.
>>>
>>> I agree with this sentiment. I'd vote for skipping the "/*" notation
>>> for just the "/", too.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> --matt
>>> --
>>> G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]> gpg id:
>>> EF9AAD20
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lpi-examdev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Bryan J Smith - http://www.linkedin.com/in/bjsmith
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lpi-examdev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
