+1 for these changes...samba 3 should definitely go. I know there are a lot of samba3 installs still out there....but there shouldn't be. :)
On Sep 17, 2016 2:17 PM, "Fabian Thorns" <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > taking a look at > > https://wiki.lpi.org/wiki/LPIC-3_300_Objectives_V1 > > You will notice that it's time to review the current LPIC-300 objectives > to ensure they are still up to date. Therefore I'd like you all to share > your thoughts about our current objectives with the list, including wishes > what should be changed in the next update. We have however to obey that it > will be "minor update", so we can't fundamentally turn the while exam > around. > > Some things we should discuss from my point of view would be: > > * Relevance of NT4 domains vs. AD domains > * Same for NBNS vs. DNS > * Shift from Samba 3 to Samba 4 (which shouldn't cause too much trouble, > though) > > However, I don't want to limit the discussion on these points. Just go > ahead and point out what you think. As usual, I will comment when necessary > and condense all the comments into a draft for potential updated objectives > which we will then review altogether again. > > Looking forward to an interesting discussion, > > Fabian > > > _______________________________________________ > lpi-examdev mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev >
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
