Everyone knows who I feel about LPIC-1 (e.g., not LPI v. Red Hat, but LPIC-1 + RHCSA, for even Red Hat folk), and I refused to shy away from it, even when I worked for Red Hat (2007-2014, 2015-2016). But I also have to be careful that I don't say too much in an official capacity, on-behalf of anyone, or get little details wrong.
Just to put that out there, since I commented on an archived list. ;) -- bjs P.S. To be forward, there aren't any anti-LPI people in Red Hat. But there can be the legal implications for Red Hat, and people may be shied away from various endeavors or comments. Randy Russell, among others, were some of the people who appreciated my insights into LPI's tracks. On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Lennart Sorensen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 03:17:21PM -0400, Bryan Smith wrote: >> No, you were supposed to laugh at me being oblivious. ;) > > Well I guess that's what we were doing then. > > It was interesting to read after all. > > -- > Len Sorensen > _______________________________________________ > lpi-examdev mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev -- -- Bryan J Smith - http://www.linkedin.com/in/bjsmith E-mail: b.j.smith at ieee.org or me at bjsmith.me _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
