LPIC 1 materials need to be written again from scratch (my opinion) and
from my experience what students like more are the exercises meaning to
have practical exercises to practice in order to learn how to do things.

Regards,

Costas Senekkis

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2017 11:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: lpi-examdev Digest, Vol 105, Issue 2

Send lpi-examdev mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of lpi-examdev digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re:  dealing with the dearth of LPIC training materials
      (Anselm Lingnau)
   2. Re:  dealing with the dearth of LPIC training materials
      (Marco Verleun)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 10:15:36 +0100
From: Anselm Lingnau <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [lpi-examdev] dealing with the dearth of LPIC training
        materials
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <2035900.cFfS5zCJlt@ceilidh>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Kenneth Peiruza wrote:

> LPIC 1 order isn't the most intuitive.

I don't think anyone ever claimed that the order of the objectives in the
list is the order in which they should be taught or presented in a book.
You could do it in a book that presupposes its readers are quite
conversant with Linux and just need some cracks filled in for the exam,
but for people who are fairly new to Linux, the approach, as we say in the
business, sucks.

At the risk of tooting my own horn, while we're talking LPIC training
materials, in the tuxcademy project we have a bunch of free manuals for
LPIC-1 at https://www.tuxcademy.org/ and they're generally getting rave
reviews. I agree that more work is needed for LPIC-2 (let alone LPIC-3),
but as far as
LPIC-1 is concerned we're good.

If anyone wants to work with us on writing or translating free Linux/FLOSS
training materials then contact me.

Anselm
--
Anselm Lingnau ? [email protected] ? https://www.tuxcademy.org Freie
Schulungsmaterialien f?r Linux und Open-Source-Software Free Training
Materials for Linux and Open-Source Software


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 10:30:47 +0100
From: Marco Verleun <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [lpi-examdev] dealing with the dearth of LPIC training
        materials
To: "This is the lpi-examdev mailing list." <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Has anyone seen this before?

http://lpic2.unix.nl <http://lpic2.unix.nl/>


Met vriendelijke groeten,

Marco Verleun










[email protected]
www.marcoach.nl
06-44 55 22 70

? Certified Master Trainer
LPI Certified
Lid Apple Consultants Network

BTW: NL-191980882B02
KvK: 54438519
DUNS: 49-041-7366
Registered with CRKBO: https://www.crkbo.nl/Register/Docenten




> Op 9 mrt. 2017, om 10:15 heeft Anselm Lingnau <[email protected]> het
volgende geschreven:
>
> Kenneth Peiruza wrote:
>
>> LPIC 1 order isn't the most intuitive.
>
> I don't think anyone ever claimed that the order of the objectives in
the list
> is the order in which they should be taught or presented in a book. You
could
> do it in a book that presupposes its readers are quite conversant with
Linux
> and just need some cracks filled in for the exam, but for people who are
> fairly new to Linux, the approach, as we say in the business, sucks.
>
> At the risk of tooting my own horn, while we're talking LPIC training
> materials, in the tuxcademy project we have a bunch of free manuals for
LPIC-1
> at https://www.tuxcademy.org/ and they're generally getting rave
reviews. I
> agree that more work is needed for LPIC-2 (let alone LPIC-3), but as far
as
> LPIC-1 is concerned we're good.
>
> If anyone wants to work with us on writing or translating free
Linux/FLOSS
> training materials then contact me.
>
> Anselm
> --
> Anselm Lingnau ? [email protected] ? https://www.tuxcademy.org
> Freie Schulungsmaterialien f?r Linux und Open-Source-Software
> Free Training Materials for Linux and Open-Source Software
> _______________________________________________
> lpi-examdev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/lpi-examdev/attachments/201703
09/de40bb39/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PastedGraphic-7.tiff
Type: image/tiff
Size: 13228 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/lpi-examdev/attachments/201703
09/de40bb39/attachment.tiff
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
Url :
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/lpi-examdev/attachments/201703
09/de40bb39/attachment.pgp

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

End of lpi-examdev Digest, Vol 105, Issue 2
*******************************************
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to