Hi,

I'm using SOLARIS 7 on a E250 with LPRng 3.8.3 and it easily handles
several hundreds of jobs without any of the described problems (well at
least I never recognised anything alike) I think this might be a bug in an
older version of LPRng (?)

best regards
        ~christoph


-- 
/*   Christoph Beyer     |   Office: Building 2b / 23     *\
 *   DESY                |    Phone: 040-8998-2317        *
 *   - IT -              |      Fax: 040-8998-4060        *
\*   22603 Hamburg       |     http://www.desy.de         */


On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Greg Trounson wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> I have a production RedHat7.1 server running LPRng-3.7.4-22, serving two
> HP 4MVs in a laboratory of 30 PCs.
>
> At peak times, there may be 30 people trying to print two jobs each
> through the server, resulting in 60 jobs on the print queue.
> When the number of jobs gets this high, the print server appears to slow
> to a crawl.  The printers both sit pretty much idle, leisurely printing
> a page every minute or so.  This morning, the job turnaround time (time
> from when someone clicked 'print' to when the paper came out of the
> printer) had reached 75 minutes(!).
>
> CPU usage on the server is minimal (load average below 1.0), memory
> usage is about 70%, it doesn't touch the swap partition, and there is
> plenty of free disk space on all partitions.
> The hard drive is going full-steam though.  It seems that it is
> continuously reading/writing the /var/spool/lpd/lp directory, which now
> consists of sixty or so 20KB print jobs.  A check of /proc/interrupts
> reveals that the hard drive is communicating at about 100 interrupts per
> second.
>
> The system remains in this state (printing out about a page per minute
> and thrashing the disk while even more jobs accumulate) until people
> stop sending jobs and the queue eventually falls below perhaps fifty
> jobs.  The remaining jobs are then rapidly processed and the quese
> empties in a couple of minutes.
>
> Is there a known limit to the number of jobs that LPRng can handle?
> Does it attempt to somehow sort the spool files on the disk whenever a
> new job arrives (this is the only reason I can think of that the hard
> disk would be thrashing), and if so, why?
>
> In accordance with advice on this list, I have since added all the lab
> machines to the server's /etc/hosts file.  I'm not sure how much that
> will help in this case, but it's sensible, nonetheless.
>
> thank you in advance for any help,
> Greg
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YOU MUST BE A LIST MEMBER IN ORDER TO POST TO THE LPRNG MAILING LIST
> The address you post from MUST be your subscription address
>
> If you need help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or lprng-requests
> or lprng-digest-requests) with the word 'help' in the body.  For the impatient,
> to subscribe to a list with name LIST,  send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with:                           | example:
> subscribe LIST <mailaddr>       |  subscribe lprng-digest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> unsubscribe LIST <mailaddr>     |  unsubscribe lprng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> If you have major problems,  send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word
> LPRNGLIST in the SUBJECT line.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
YOU MUST BE A LIST MEMBER IN ORDER TO POST TO THE LPRNG MAILING LIST
The address you post from MUST be your subscription address

If you need help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or lprng-requests
or lprng-digest-requests) with the word 'help' in the body.  For the impatient,
to subscribe to a list with name LIST,  send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with:                           | example:
subscribe LIST <mailaddr>       |  subscribe lprng-digest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe LIST <mailaddr>     |  unsubscribe lprng [EMAIL PROTECTED]

If you have major problems,  send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word
LPRNGLIST in the SUBJECT line.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to