lsb-discuss  

Messages by Date

• 2001/05/08 Re: LSB on /. Dave Greene
• 2001/05/08 Re: Packaging and installation Glenn McGrath
• 2001/05/08 Re: Packaging and installation John H Terpstra
• 2001/05/08 Re: appchk results: MimerSQL Matt Wilson
• 2001/05/08 Re: Packaging and installation Stuart Anderson
• 2001/05/08 Re: Packaging and installation Chris Yeoh
• 2001/05/08 Re: Packaging and installation Glenn McGrath
• 2001/05/08 Re: appchk results: MimerSQL Stuart Anderson
• 2001/05/08 An interesting one... IBM JDK appchk results Matt Wilson
• 2001/05/08 appchk results: MimerSQL Matt Wilson
• 2001/05/08 appchk test results: bru-client Matt Wilson
• 2001/05/08 appchk test results: Pervasive SQL server Matt Wilson
• 2001/05/08 appchk test results: sweep Matt Wilson
• 2001/05/08 Re: A test of the -L flag for appchk Stuart Anderson
• 2001/05/08 appchk test results: tenpt Matt Wilson
• 2001/05/08 Re: A test of the -L flag for appchk Matt Wilson
• 2001/05/08 Re: A test of the -L flag for appchk Stuart Anderson
• 2001/05/08 appchk test results: acroread: Matt Wilson
• 2001/05/08 A test of the -L flag for appchk Matt Wilson
• 2001/05/08 Re: LSB on /. Me
• 2001/05/08 Re: lsbdev and FHS (was: "Specification v 0.8") Flavio Veloso
• 2001/05/08 LSB on /. Scott McNeil
• 2001/05/07 Request For Comments on LSB v0.9 gk4
• 2001/05/06 Re: "LSB 1.0" Anthony W. Youngman
• 2001/05/04 Sourceforge bug tracker working gk4
• 2001/05/04 Sourceforge bug tracker broken gk4
• 2001/05/03 LSB Status from the Committee Chairman gk4
• 2001/05/03 Re: lsbdev and FHS (was: "Specification v 0.8") Johannes Poehlmann
• 2001/05/02 Re: lsbdev and FHS (was: "Specification v 0.8") Flavio Veloso
• 2001/05/02 Re: Task 23709 gk4
• 2001/05/02 Task 23709 Andreas Jaeger
• 2001/05/01 Re: Renaming the LSB? (was: Re: Specification v 0.8) Mike A. Harris
• 2001/04/30 Re: Renaming the LSB? (was: Re: Specification v 0.8) Trond Eivind Glomsrød
• 2001/04/30 Re: Specification v 0.8 Dale Scheetz
• 2001/04/30 Version 0.8.1 Spec Stuart Anderson
• 2001/04/30 Re: Renaming the LSB? (was: Re: Specification v 0.8) Alan Cox
• 2001/04/30 Re: Renaming the LSB? (was: Re: Specification v 0.8) David L. Nicol
• 2001/04/30 Re: Renaming the LSB? (was: Re: Specification v 0.8) David L. Nicol
• 2001/04/30 Re: Renaming the LSB? (was: Re: Specification v 0.8) Trond Eivind Glomsrød
• 2001/04/30 Re: Renaming the LSB? (was: Re: Specification v 0.8) Dan Kegel
• 2001/04/30 Renaming the LSB? (was: Re: Specification v 0.8) Jim Knoble
• 2001/04/30 Re: Specification v 0.8 Peter Makholm
• 2001/04/30 Re: Specification v 0.8 Stuart Anderson
• 2001/04/30 Re: Specification v 0.8 Alan Cox
• 2001/04/30 Re: Specification v 0.8 Stuart Anderson
• 2001/04/30 Re: lsbdev and FHS (was: "Specification v 0.8") Johannes Poehlmann
• 2001/04/29 Re: Specification v 0.8 Dan Kegel
• 2001/04/29 Re: Specification v 0.8 Andy Tai
• 2001/04/28 Re: Specification v 0.8 David L. Nicol
• 2001/04/28 Re: Specification v 0.8 Dan Kegel
• 2001/04/28 Re: Specification v 0.8 Jim Knoble
• 2001/04/28 Re: Specification v 0.8 Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/04/28 Re: Specification v 0.8 Jim Knoble
• 2001/04/28 Re: Specification v 0.8 Scott McNeil
• 2001/04/27 Re: Specification v 0.8 Frank LaMonica
• 2001/04/27 Re: Specification v 0.8 Theodore Tso
• 2001/04/26 lsbdev and FHS (was: "Specification v 0.8") Flavio Veloso
• 2001/04/26 multi-architecture hdrchk Stuart Anderson
• 2001/04/26 Re: Specification v 0.8 Andy Tai
• 2001/04/26 Specification v 0.8 Stuart Anderson
• 2001/04/26 Re: ld-lsb.so Andreas Jaeger
• 2001/04/25 Re: /proc format (was Device Registry (DevReg) Patch 0.2.0) Dan Kegel
• 2001/04/25 ld-lsb.so gk4
• 2001/04/23 Re: Included Interfaces without documentation update Richard Kettlewell
• 2001/04/23 Re: Included Interfaces without documentation update Dan Kegel
• 2001/04/23 Attn: Sales Manager Bernard Hartken
• 2001/04/23 Re: Included Interfaces without documentation update Stuart Anderson
• 2001/04/21 Re: Included Interfaces without documentation update Dan Kegel
• 2001/04/21 Re: Included Interfaces without documentation update Andreas Jaeger
• 2001/04/21 Re: Included Interfaces without documentation update Dan Kegel
• 2001/04/21 Re: Included Interfaces without documentation update Dan Kegel
• 2001/04/21 Re: Included Interfaces without documentation update Andreas Jaeger
• 2001/04/21 Re: Included Interfaces without documentation update Dan Kegel
• 2001/04/21 [[email protected]] Mail message not delivered Andreas Jaeger
• 2001/04/21 Re: Included Interfaces without documentation update Andreas Jaeger
• 2001/04/21 Re: Included Interfaces without documentation update Dan Kegel
• 2001/04/21 Re: Included Interfaces without documentation update Andreas Jaeger
• 2001/04/20 Re: Included Interfaces without documentation update Dan Kegel
• 2001/04/20 Re: Included Interfaces without documentation update Andreas Jaeger
• 2001/04/20 Need Free Standards Group Speakers Scott McNeil
• 2001/04/20 Re: Order of look-up for included interfaces Keld Jørn Simonsen
• 2001/04/20 Re: Order of look-up for included interfaces Dan Kegel
• 2001/04/20 Re: Included Interfaces without documentation update Dan Kegel
• 2001/04/20 Re: Order of look-up for included interfaces Gordon Sadler
• 2001/04/20 Re: Order of look-up for included interfaces Andreas Jaeger
• 2001/04/20 Re: Order of look-up for included interfaces Andreas Jaeger
• 2001/04/20 Re: Included Interfaces without documentation update Andreas Jaeger
• 2001/04/20 Re: Order of look-up for included interfaces Dan Kegel
• 2001/04/20 Order of look-up for included interfaces Andrew Pham
• 2001/04/20 Re: Included Interfaces without documentation update Dan Kegel
• 2001/04/20 Re: Included Interfaces without documentation update Andreas Jaeger
• 2001/04/20 Re: Included Interfaces without documentation update Philipp Thomas
• 2001/04/19 Re: Does the Linux Standard Base imply Linux? Stuart Anderson
• 2001/04/19 Re: Does the Linux Standard Base imply Linux? Dan Kegel
• 2001/04/19 Re: Does the Linux Standard Base imply Linux? Me
• 2001/04/19 Does the Linux Standard Base imply Linux? Kevin Dankwardt
• 2001/04/19 www.vedatguresen.com SayısalLOTO
• 2001/04/19 Included Interfaces without documentation update Andrew Pham
• 2001/04/12 v 0.7.6 Stuart Anderson
• 2001/04/10 Included Interfaces without Documentation Update Andrew Pham
• 2001/04/07 LSB Needs You gk4
• 2001/04/06 Re: "LSB 1.0" Frank LaMonica
• 2001/04/06 Re: "LSB 1.0" Me
• 2001/04/06 [no subject] pippo
• 2001/04/06 Re: "LSB 1.0" Theodore Tso
• 2001/04/05 Re: LSB wrapper library Jason Gunthorpe
• 2001/04/04 Included Interfaces without documentation status. Andrew Pham
• 2001/04/04 "LSB 1.0" Me
• 2001/04/04 Re: LSB wrapper library Andreas Jaeger
• 2001/04/04 Re: LSB wrapper library Stuart Anderson
• 2001/04/03 Re: LSB wrapper library Jason Gunthorpe
• 2001/04/03 Re: LSB wrapper library Thorsten Kukuk
• 2001/04/03 Re: LSB wrapper library Matt Wilson
• 2001/04/03 Re: LSB wrapper library Thorsten Kukuk
• 2001/04/03 Re: Included Interface without documentation Daniel Quinlan
• 2001/04/03 Re: LSB wrapper library Matt Wilson
• 2001/04/03 Re: Included Interface without documentation Andrew Pham
• 2001/04/03 Re: LSB wrapper library Andreas Jaeger
• 2001/04/03 Re: LSB wrapper library Stuart Anderson
• 2001/04/03 Re: LSB wrapper library Stuart Anderson
• 2001/04/03 Re: LSB wrapper library Stuart Anderson
• 2001/04/03 Re: LSB wrapper library Matt Wilson
• 2001/04/03 Re: LSB wrapper library Matt Wilson
• 2001/04/03 Re: LSB wrapper library Thorsten Kukuk
• 2001/04/03 Re: LSB wrapper library Andreas Jaeger
• 2001/04/03 Re: LSB wrapper library Stuart Anderson
• 2001/04/03 Re: LSB wrapper library Andreas Jaeger
• 2001/04/03 Re: LSB wrapper library Matt Wilson
• 2001/04/03 Re: LSB wrapper library Matt Wilson
• 2001/04/03 Re: LSB wrapper library Andreas Jaeger
• 2001/04/03 Re: LSB wrapper library Matt Wilson
• 2001/04/03 LSB wrapper library Andreas Jaeger
• 2001/04/02 Re: Included Interface without documentation Daniel Quinlan
• 2001/04/01 Commands spec update Chris Yeoh
• 2001/03/28 first Release of LSB implementation Johannes Poehlmann
• 2001/03/26 Re: We need you for the LSB v0.7.1 R-E-V-I-E-W Me
• 2001/03/26 Re: We need you for the LSB v0.7.1 R-E-V-I-E-W Stuart Anderson
• 2001/03/26 Re: We need you for the LSB v0.7.1 R-E-V-I-E-W Ralph Mellor (ralphat dimpdotcom)
• 2001/03/26 Re: We need you for the LSB v0.7.1 R-E-V-I-E-W gk4
• 2001/03/26 Re: We need you for the LSB v0.7.1 R-E-V-I-E-W Jimmy Richards
• 2001/03/26 Re: We need you for the LSB v0.7.1 R-E-V-I-E-W ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
• 2001/03/26 We need you for the LSB v0.7.1 R-E-V-I-E-W gk4
• 2001/03/25 . mk832mn57
• 2001/03/22 Uçak biletlerinizi almadan... SuperTicket
• 2001/03/15 Vestel ' den Ayin Urunleri internettv
• 2001/03/14 Re: Caldera claims "LSB 1.0 implementation" in Project 42 beta announcement Scott McNeil
• 2001/03/14 Go4job.net, la plus grande banque d'emplois au Qu�bec vente
• 2001/03/14 FSG/LDPS/LSB/FHS & George Kraft on ./ Scott McNeil
• 2001/03/14 RE: Caldera claims "LSB 1.0 implementation" in Project 42 beta announcement Raja Srinivasan
• 2001/03/14 Re: command conflicts between FHS 2.2 beta and LSB specification Daniel Quinlan
• 2001/03/14 RE: command conflicts between FHS 2.2 beta and LSB specification Todd Lukes
• 2001/03/14 Re: command conflicts between FHS 2.2 beta and LSB specification Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/03/14 Re: command conflicts between FHS 2.2 beta and LSB specification Stuart Anderson
• 2001/03/14 Re: command conflicts between FHS 2.2 beta and LSB specification Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/03/14 Re: command conflicts between FHS 2.2 beta and LSB specification Stuart Anderson
• 2001/03/14 Re: Caldera claims "LSB 1.0 implementation" in Project 42 beta announcement Johannes Poehlmann
• 2001/03/14 Re: command conflicts between FHS 2.2 beta and LSB specification Johannes Poehlmann
• 2001/03/13 Re: Caldera claims "LSB 1.0 implementation" in Project 42 beta announcement Ralf Flaxa
• 2001/03/13 command conflicts between FHS 2.2 beta and LSB specification Christopher Yeoh
• 2001/03/13 Re: Caldera claims "LSB 1.0 implementation" in Project 42 beta announcement Scott McNeil
• 2001/03/13 Caldera claims "LSB 1.0 implementation" in Project 42 beta announcement Matt Wilson
• 2001/03/12 Re: ncurses specification Stuart Anderson
• 2001/03/12 Re: ncurses specification Thomas E. Dickey
• 2001/03/12 Re: ncurses specification Stuart Anderson
• 2001/03/08 New LSB Chairman Daniel Quinlan
• 2001/03/08 Re: Versions of chfn Christopher Yeoh
• 2001/03/08 Re: Versions of chfn Johannes Poehlmann
• 2001/03/08 Re: Versions of chfn gk4
• 2001/03/08 Re: Versions of chfn Christopher Yeoh
• 2001/03/08 Re: Versions of chfn gk4
• 2001/03/08 Included Interfaces Without Standards [ISO C 99] Andreas Jaeger
• 2001/03/08 Re: soname of libGL needs fixing Stuart Anderson
• 2001/03/08 soname of libGL needs fixing Matt Wilson
• 2001/03/07 Re: Undecided Interfaces Andreas Jaeger
• 2001/03/07 Re: Undecided Interfaces Stuart Anderson
• 2001/03/07 Undecided Interfaces Andreas Jaeger
• 2001/03/06 Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt Matt Wilson
• 2001/03/06 Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt Stuart Anderson
• 2001/03/05 Re: ncurses specification Thomas Dickey
• 2001/03/05 Re: Fonts in the LSB? Lenz Grimmer
• 2001/03/02 There yours for FREE! zx11zx14
• 2001/03/02 There yours for FREE! zx11zx14
• 2001/03/02 Re: exclude GLX symbols Stuart Anderson
• 2001/03/02 Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt Stuart Anderson
• 2001/03/01 Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt Matt Wilson
• 2001/03/01 struct msgbuf is not needed and should be excluded Matt Wilson
• 2001/03/01 Fonts in the LSB? Matt Taggart
• 2001/03/01 Re: exclude GLX symbols Stuart Anderson
• 2001/03/01 Re: exclude GLX symbols Matt Wilson
• 2001/03/01 Re: building appcheck requires C99 Matt Wilson
• 2001/03/01 Re: exclude GLX symbols Stuart Anderson
• 2001/03/01 Re: exclude GLX symbols Matt Wilson
• 2001/03/01 Re: exclude GLX symbols Stuart Anderson
• 2001/03/01 Re: exclude GLX symbols Stuart Anderson
• 2001/03/01 Re: oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt Stuart Anderson
• 2001/03/01 exclude GLX symbols Matt Wilson
• 2001/03/01 oh. the sizeof() problem is worse than I thougt Matt Wilson
• 2001/03/01 devchk makes assumptions on sizeof void* Matt Wilson
• 2001/03/01 devchk: stdlib_h.c checks internal drand48_data struct members Matt Wilson
• 2001/03/01 Re: building appcheck requires C99 Matt Wilson

• Earlier messages
• Later messages