On 20 Mar 2000, Jochem Huhmann wrote: > Sorry for asking back: What technical or logical reasons do distributors > have to insist on defining at will what is part of the base system and > what not? As I've said more than once, the issue actually is not where > the software should go to, the issue is if LSB should define a base > system or not.
Why are an OS base and the contents of /usr identical? I don't think they are, and putting things in /usr which are not part of the base OS is perfectly reasonable and well-accepted in the Linux community. Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | "Who is John Galt?" - Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand | | | | Linux Application Development -- http://people.redhat.com/johnsonm/lad |
