> Put another way, an LSB that standardizes numerous special > cases will be > no more concise for simple cases than the status quo (cf. "requires > glibc2.1 and FHS 2.0" with "requires LSBbasic1.0a, LSBdns2.1c") and > uselessly complicated for the least-common-denominator user (cf. > "requires LSB 1.0" and "requires LSBbasic1.0a, LSBx2.0, LSBfoo1.3, > LSBbar1.1")
In my original message I used "Bind" as "the (RPM?) package containing the BIND dns server" just like any other server should be shipped as a package. For the dns server package, the only things I need should be in the "LSB Core" subset/profile/layer. -- Vincent de Lau ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
