Hi, First I think that saying what LSB is not about is a good thing, as I think that some people (as for me in the past for example) have the idea that a linux standard base is something more constraining than what is doing the LSB. I am not saying that it is a good or bad thing, and in fact I think that the people doing LSB are the only one that have the legitimacy to set the limit of LSB, as this is the people implementing the distributions (looking at and involving the members of the linux community other than ISV and distribution makers is also important).
But then as I come back to the reason why I get interrested in LSB, that is I had 2 distributions on a desktop computer, and it was really difficult to share /home between the two because of the incompatibility of the user scripts, I remark that this problem is not really in the scope of LSB (am I wrong here ?), although IMO it could be a good thing easying my little user life ! So my question is, how to make a place to put new things in the scope of the LSB, as this is the only way to have an impact on distributions, so that it doesn't make people working on LSB losing time in long, controversial, and of smaller interest that real work mail exchanges ? Pat
