Circa 2002-Mar-04 12:21:46 +1000 dixit Anthony Towns: : The LSB spec doesn't provide any standard way to install a package, so : "as per the LSB" isn't really appropriate, and that quality vendors will : probably provide a simple (graphical) tool to do so, that matches their : normal installation tools. : : Note also that the goal is to make every distribution LSB compliant, so : that "LSB system" will be equivalent to "Linux system" and thus redundant. : : It's probably worth specing something like "LSB compliant vendors will : include an easily locatable section in their documentation detailing : precisely how to install LSB compliant packages on their system."
My point was that 'lsb-blah-ththth.lsb' is rather redundant. Either call packages 'lsb-blah-ththth.rpm' or 'blah-ththth.lsb'. Both is too much. -- jim knoble | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.pobox.com/~jmknoble/
