Johannes, I see in the minimal sample implementation that we use:
glibc-2.2.1-3_lsb_0.4_1 glibc-devel-2.2.1-3_lsb_0.4_1 DEV-3.5-1 ncurses-5.2-5.lsb.0.5.0 bash-1.14.7-16.lsb.0.5.0 fileutils-4.0-9.lsb.0.5.0 strace-4.2-8.20010221a pax-2.1-1.lsb.0.5.0 Where do we get the original binaries and source? In the SOUCES directory, why do we only have a patch for glibc? How does one recreate this environment? How do these relate to the /lib/lsb that we (Stuart) provides in lsbdev? Are these libraries filtering to the LSB sample implementation? /usr/bin/lsbappchk /usr/bin/lsblibchk /usr/lsb/lib/libGL.so /usr/lsb/lib/libICE.so /usr/lsb/lib/libSM.so /usr/lsb/lib/libX11.so /usr/lsb/lib/libXext.so /usr/lsb/lib/libXt.so /usr/lsb/lib/libc.so /usr/lsb/lib/libcrypt.so /usr/lsb/lib/libcurses.so /usr/lsb/lib/libdl.so /usr/lsb/lib/libm.so /usr/lsb/lib/libpthread.so /usr/lsb/lib/libtrt.so /usr/lsb/lib/libutil.so /usr/lsb/lib/libz.so Where does /lib/ld-lsb.so get built? Is it provided in the LSB sample implementation, in "lsbdev", or where? To build an LSB compliant application in the LSB sample implementation, would I do the following? gcc -o foo -Wall foo.c -L/usr/lsb/lib -Wl,--dynamic-linker=/lib/ld-lsb.so.1 If I run ldd on foo, then would I see ld-lsb.so.1 and /usr/lib/lib libraries? Thanks, George Kraft IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] IBM Linux Technology Center FSG's Linux Standard Base
